Disabling musculoskeletal pain in working populations: is it the job, the person, or the culture?

 

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Coggon, David, Ntani, Georgia, Palmer, Keith T., Felli, Vanda E., Harari, Raul, Barrero, Lope, Felknor, Sarah, Gimeno, David, Cattrell, Anna, Serra, Consol, Bonzini, Matteo, Solidaki, Eleni, Merisalu, Eda, Habib, Rima R., Sadeghian, Farideh, Muhammad Masood, Kadir, Warnakulasuriya, Sudath, Matsudaira, Ko, Nyantumbu, Busisiwe, Sim, Malcolm R., Harcombe, Helen, Cox, Ken, Marziale, Maria Helena Palucci, Sarquis, Leila M.M., harari, florencia, Freire, Rocio, Harari, Natalia, Monroy Silva, Magda Viviana, Quintana , Leonardo, Rojas, Marianela, Salazar Vega, Eduardo J., Harris, Clare, Vargas-Prada, Sergio, Martinez, J. Miguel, Delclos, George, Benavides, Fernando G., Carugno, Michele, Ferrario, Marco M, pesatori, angela, Chatzi, Leda, Bitsios, Panos, Kogevinas, Manolis, Oha, Kristel, Sirk, Tuuli, Sadeghian, Ali, Peiris-John, Roshini, Sathiakumar, Nalini, Wickremasinghe, A. Rajitha, Yoshimura, Noriko, Kelsall, Helen, Hoe, Victor C.W., Urquhart, Donna M., Derrett, Sarah, McBride, David, Herbison, Graham Peter, Gray, Andrew
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2013
Descripción:To compare the prevalence of disabling low back pain (DLBP) and disabling wrist/hand pain (DWHP) among groups of workers carrying out similar physical activities in different cultural environments, and to explore explanations for observed differences, we conducted a crosssectional survey in 18 countries. Standardised questionnaires were used to ascertain pain that interfered with everyday activities and exposure to possible risk factors in 12,426 participants from 47 occupational groups (mostly nurses and office workers). Associations with risk factors were assessed by Poisson regression. The 1-month prevalence of DLBP in nurses varied from 9.6% to 42.6%, and that of DWHP in office workers from 2.2% to 31.6%. Rates of disabling pain at the 2 anatomical sites covaried (r = 0.76), but DLBP tended to be relatively more common in nurses and DWHP in office workers. Established risk factors such as occupational physical activities, psychosocial aspects of work, and tendency to somatise were confirmed, and associations were found also with adverse health beliefs and group awareness of people outside work with musculoskeletal pain. However, after allowance for these risk factors, an up-to 8-fold difference in prevalence remained. Systems of compensation for work-related illness and financial support for health-related incapacity for work appeared to have little influence on the occurrence of symptoms. Our findings indicate large international variation in the prevalence of disabling forearm and back pain among occupational groups carrying out similar tasks, which is only partially explained by the personal and socioeconomic risk factors that were analysed.
País:Repositorio UNA
Institución:Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica
Repositorio:Repositorio UNA
Lenguaje:Inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:https://repositorio.una.ac.cr:11056/23150
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/11056/23150
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.02.008
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:DOLOR
ECONOMÍA SOCIAL
ESPALDA (ANATOMIA)
INTERNACIONAL
PSICOLOGÍA SOCIAL
PAIN
SOCIAL ECONOMY
BACK (ANATOMY)
INTERNATIONAL
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY