Evaluating the implementation of PROMs and PREMs in routine clinical care: co‑design of tools from the perspective of patients and healthcare professionals

 

Guardat en:
Dades bibliogràfiques
Autors: Amat Fernandez, Clara, Pardo Cladellas, Yolanda, Ferrer, Montse, Bosch, Guillermo, Lizano Barrantes, Catalina, Briseño Diaz, Renata, Vernet Tomas, Maria, Fumadó, Lluís, Beisani, Marc, Redondo Pachón, Dolores, Bach Pascual, Anna, Garin, Olatz, Hospital de Mar Patient-Reported Measures Group
Data de publicació:2025
Descripció:Background Implementation of patient-reported measures (PRMs) is an integral element for patient-centered models; however, there is still hardly any quantitative evidence regarding its impact in routine care settings. The objective of this study was to codesign two concise tools that allow for a standardized and longitudinal assessment of the implementation of PRMs in routine care in terms of acceptability and perceived value from the perspective of both patients and healthcare professionals. Methods A list of constructs and items to be presented, separately, to patients and healthcare professionals was cre‑ ated from evidence gathered through a narrative literature review. Focus groups, composed of either patients or healthcare professionals from different chronic conditions, were conducted for the co-design of independent assessments. Once agreement was reached, the content validity was examined in separate consensus meetings. Results A total of 10 patients and 10 healthcare professionals participated in the focus groups. After 7 focus groups, the PRMs Implementation Assessment Tool for patients (PRMIAT-P) was developed with 33 items in 9 constructs, and the tool for healthcare professionals (PRMIAT-HP) had 33 items in 16 constructs. Content validity was confirmed for both tools. Conclusions The perspective of patients and healthcare professionals regarding the implementation of PRMs in routine care can be evaluated quantitively with the PRMIAT tools. These tools are understandable, concise and com‑ prehensive, and can be used in multiple settings and for different chronic conditions. They have been codesigned as a standard set to facilitate both longitudinal assessments and performing benchmarking among different initiatives.
Pais:Kérwá
Institution:Universidad de Costa Rica
Repositorio:Kérwá
Idioma:Inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:kerwa.ucr.ac.cr:10669/105026
Accés en línia:https://hdl.handle.net/10669/105026
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-025-02333-7
Paraula clau:Implementation science
Health services research
Patient-reported outcome measures
Patient-reported experience measures
Patient centered care
Health care evaluation mechanisms
Healthcare quality assessment
Co-design
Routine clinical care