AMPARO PROCEEDING: CRITERIA DEVELOPED BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHAMBER TO DEFINE ITS JURISDICTION VIS-À-VIS ORDINARY COURTS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR LEGAL CERTAINTY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE JUSTICE
Kaydedildi:
| Yazarlar: | , |
|---|---|
| Materyal Türü: | artículo original |
| Durum: | Versión publicada |
| Yayın Tarihi: | 2025 |
| Diğer Bilgiler: | This article examines the evolving jurisprudence of Costa Rica’s Constitutional Chamber in environmental matters, highlighting its shift from a broadly inclusive approach—grounded in the pro actione principle—towards increasingly restrictive criteria regarding jurisdiction over environmental amparo proceedings. |
| Ülke: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| Kurum: | Universidad de Costa Rica |
| Repositorio: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| Dil: | Español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:portal.revistas.ucr.ac.cr:article/2665 |
| Online Erişim: | https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rjuridicas/article/view/2665 |
| Anahtar Kelime: | Environmental and climate justice. Amparo proceeding. Environmental Human Rights. Conventionality control. Constitutional bloc. Pro homine and pro natura hermeneutics. Justicia ambiental y climática; recurso de amparo; derechos humanos ambientales; control de convencionalidad; bloque de constitucionalidad hermenéutica pro homine y pro natura. |