¿«Populismo» o «garantismo», para la doctrina del derecho penal?: Alternativa confusa y confusionista
Guardado en:
| Údar: | |
|---|---|
| Formáid: | artículo original |
| Stádas: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2018 |
| Cur Síos: | This article seeks to show that “populism” and “criminal guarantees” are labels with a limited clarifying scope. On the contrary, they are befuddling in criminal law doctrine. Both are innocuous, but they can be also be dangerous in order to furnish a lucid guide, that is empiricallyscientifically, for practical solutions that may be appropriate to this field. |
| País: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| Institiúid: | Universidad de Costa Rica |
| Repositorio: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| Teanga: | Español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/34750 |
| Rochtain Ar Líne: | https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/juridicas/article/view/34750 |
| Palabra clave: | derecho penal populismo punitivo garantismo hacinamiento carcelario Criminal law punitive populism criminal guarantees prison overcrowding |