Prácticas argumentales como métodos de investigación filosófica
保存先:
| 著者: | |
|---|---|
| フォーマット: | artículo original |
| 状態: | Versión publicada |
| 出版日付: | 2017 |
| その他の書誌記述: | In this paper we reflect about some characteristics of the philosophic method that, I suppose, will be common to us in the fundamental. It exposes, synthetically, two contemporary argumentative practices: (neo)Socratic dialogue and dilemmatraining, after which we can show that such argumentative practices could be considered methods of philosophical investigation. |
| 国: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| 機関: | Universidad de Costa Rica |
| Repositorio: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| 言語: | Español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/28353 |
| オンライン･アクセス: | https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/28353 |
| キーワード: | Método filosófico Prácticas argumentales Diálogo (neo)socrático Dilemmatraining Investigación filosófica Philosophic Method Argumentative Practices (Neo)Socratic Dialogue Philosophical Investigation |