Prácticas argumentales como métodos de investigación filosófica
Guardado en:
| 作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | artículo original |
| 狀態: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2017 |
| 實物特徵: | In this paper we reflect about some characteristics of the philosophic method that, I suppose, will be common to us in the fundamental. It exposes, synthetically, two contemporary argumentative practices: (neo)Socratic dialogue and dilemmatraining, after which we can show that such argumentative practices could be considered methods of philosophical investigation. |
| País: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| 機構: | Universidad de Costa Rica |
| Repositorio: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| 語言: | Español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/28353 |
| 在線閱讀: | https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/28353 |
| Palabra clave: | Método filosófico Prácticas argumentales Diálogo (neo)socrático Dilemmatraining Investigación filosófica Philosophic Method Argumentative Practices (Neo)Socratic Dialogue Philosophical Investigation |