The limitations on the right to strike introduced by Law No. 9808 in light of the principle of non-regression
Guardado en:
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formáid: | artículo original |
| Stádas: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Cur Síos: | This article analyzes the compatibility of certain provisions of the “Law to Provide Legal Certainty on Strikes and Their Procedures” (hereinafter, “Law No. 9808”), approved in Costa Rica in 2020, with the principle of non-regression. This principle prohibits the implementation of regulations that reduce the level of protection of acquired rights unless a valid justification exists. The analysis concludes that most of the provisions reviewed unjustifiably limit the right to strike and, therefore, fail to meet the “non-regression test”, constituting a violation of the principle of non- regression. |
| País: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| Institiúid: | Universidad de Costa Rica |
| Repositorio: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| Teanga: | Español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:portal.revistas.ucr.ac.cr:article/3440 |
| Rochtain Ar Líne: | https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/riusdoctrina/article/view/3440 |
| Palabra clave: | Right to stike Principle of non-regression Economic social and cultural rights Collective Labor Law Social Conflict Derecho de huelga Principio de no regresión Derechos económicos sociales y culturales Conflicto social Derecho colectivo de trabajo |