The flexibility of criminal law compared to disciplinary administrative law in Mexico

 

Kaydedildi:
Detaylı Bibliyografya
Yazar: Noriega-Zamudio, José Jafet
Materyal Türü: artículo original
Durum:Versión publicada
Yayın Tarihi:2024
Diğer Bilgiler:Criminal law has historically been conceived as that branch of legal science that must be applied in the most delicate cases that have endangered or damaged the most precious assets of society, at a specific time and place. Even the public notion persists that it is the most reactive part of legal science, when exercising the coercive power of the State, including the restriction of freedom or imposing pecuniary sanctions. However, within the Mexican constitutional legal order, the possibility has been granted for alternative dispute resolution mechanisms to be privileged in the criminal field that have made its essence more flexible, now seeing disciplinary administrative law as more reactive. To that extent, the objective of this work is to propose some lines that offer a position on this denaturalization of criminal law; or, on its contemporary reconfiguration, for which a methodology based on constitutional and legal exegesis is used in a comparative study with the doctrine whose conclusions allow determining the increase in rigor, at least in current positive law, of administrative law which has been strengthened in the Mexican anti-corruption system, thereby attenuating the idea of criminal law as the last intervention of the legal system in the regulation of human conduct.
Ülke:Portal de Revistas UNED
Kurum:Universidad Estatal a Distancia
Repositorio:Portal de Revistas UNED
Dil:Español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.investiga.uned.ac.cr:article/5370
Online Erişim:https://revistas.uned.ac.cr/index.php/espiga/article/view/5370
Anahtar Kelime:Derecho penal
Sanciones administrativas
Administración pública
Derechos humanos
Administrative sanctions
Criminal law
Human rights
Public administration
Droit pénal
Sanctions administratives
Administration publique
Droits humains