Differences Between The Kantian Reflective Judgment And The Arendtian Reflective Judgment, And Its Rescue Through Understanding

 

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur: Pérez Boada, Héctor Fabián
Format: artículo original
Statut:Versión publicada
Date de publication:2024
Description:Kantian teleological reflective judgment was one of the unfinished concepts of the Königsberg philosopher, but it served as a basis, within the construction of Hannah Arendt's political thought, especially in the analysis of the contemplative life that the life of the spirit recorded in her work, and where he not only delves into judgment but also about will and thinking. However, this article seeks to rescue the reflective judgment coined by Hannah Arendt and appreciate the conceptual advance that she made in this regard compared to the reflective judgment given by Immanuel Kant; Likewise, the relevance of this faculty for ourtimes, being rescued from another human faculty such as understanding.
Pays:Portal de Revistas UCR
Institution:Universidad de Costa Rica
Repositorio:Portal de Revistas UCR
Langue:Español
OAI Identifier:oai:archivo.portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/54624
Accès en ligne:https://archivo.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/54624
Mots-clés:Juicio reflexionante, validez ejemplar, sociabilidad, comprensión
Reflective judgment, exemplary validity, sociability, understanding.