Differences Between The Kantian Reflective Judgment And The Arendtian Reflective Judgment, And Its Rescue Through Understanding

 

Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore: Pérez Boada, Héctor Fabián
Natura: artículo original
Status:Versión publicada
Data di pubblicazione:2024
Descrizione:Kantian teleological reflective judgment was one of the unfinished concepts of the Königsberg philosopher, but it served as a basis, within the construction of Hannah Arendt's political thought, especially in the analysis of the contemplative life that the life of the spirit recorded in her work, and where he not only delves into judgment but also about will and thinking. However, this article seeks to rescue the reflective judgment coined by Hannah Arendt and appreciate the conceptual advance that she made in this regard compared to the reflective judgment given by Immanuel Kant; Likewise, the relevance of this faculty for ourtimes, being rescued from another human faculty such as understanding.
Stato:Portal de Revistas UCR
Istituzione:Universidad de Costa Rica
Repositorio:Portal de Revistas UCR
Lingua:Español
OAI Identifier:oai:archivo.portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/54624
Accesso online:https://archivo.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/54624
Keyword:Juicio reflexionante, validez ejemplar, sociabilidad, comprensión
Reflective judgment, exemplary validity, sociability, understanding.