Differences Between The Kantian Reflective Judgment And The Arendtian Reflective Judgment, And Its Rescue Through Understanding

 

Bewaard in:
Bibliografische gegevens
Auteur: Pérez Boada, Héctor Fabián
Formaat: artículo original
Status:Versión publicada
Publicatiedatum:2024
Omschrijving:Kantian teleological reflective judgment was one of the unfinished concepts of the Königsberg philosopher, but it served as a basis, within the construction of Hannah Arendt's political thought, especially in the analysis of the contemplative life that the life of the spirit recorded in her work, and where he not only delves into judgment but also about will and thinking. However, this article seeks to rescue the reflective judgment coined by Hannah Arendt and appreciate the conceptual advance that she made in this regard compared to the reflective judgment given by Immanuel Kant; Likewise, the relevance of this faculty for ourtimes, being rescued from another human faculty such as understanding.
Land:Portal de Revistas UCR
Instelling:Universidad de Costa Rica
Repositorio:Portal de Revistas UCR
Taal:Español
OAI Identifier:oai:archivo.portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/54624
Online toegang:https://archivo.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/54624
Keyword:Juicio reflexionante, validez ejemplar, sociabilidad, comprensión
Reflective judgment, exemplary validity, sociability, understanding.