Resistance to dynamic and static loading of the implant mounts on its respective implant

 

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Blanco González, Daniela, Villalobos Ramírez, Francisco, Fernández López, Ottón, Chavarría Bolaños, Daniel, Vargas Koudriavtsev, Tatiana
Formato: artículo original
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Descripción:Introduction: Implant restorations should endure a variable range of forces over a long period of time. Some commercial brands offer the implant together with an accessory called “implant mount” or “implant holder,” which might be used as a temporary abutment. However, scientific literature in the use of implant holders as abutments for restorations is scarce. Objectives: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the load at which implant holders of Implant Direct® and Zimmer® fail under static compression after being subjected to fatigue, and to compare the gap produced between the implant–holder complexes after dynamic loading. Materials and Methods: The test protocol was based on the recommendation of ISO 14801. Five implant–implant holder assemblies of each brand were subjected to dynamic loading. A load of 250 N was applied at 5 × 106 cycles and at 15 Hz stress frequency (Eden Prairie, MN, USA). The gap (µm) at the interface was measured postfatigue using scanning electron microscopy (S‑3700N, HITACHI, Japan), and afterward, static loading was applied and the maximum load (N) after the point of failure was established. Implant–definitive abutment complexes were used as controls. Data were analyzed by means of a central tendency measurement test Mann–Whitney U‑test (nonparametric). Results: There was no difference between both the implant holder groups (P ≤ 0.05); however, a slight trend of greater resistance was observed for the Zimmer® group. The gap in the interface was greater for Implant Direct® implants, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: No significant differences were found in terms of the maximum load under compression or the interface gap after the dynamic loading in the two experimental groups.
País:Kérwá
Institución:Universidad de Costa Rica
Repositorio:Kérwá
Lenguaje:Inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:kerwa.ucr.ac.cr:10669/85908
Acceso en línea:https://www.jdionline.org/article.asp?issn=0974-6781;year=2021;volume=11;issue=2;spage=78;epage=83;aulast=Blanco-Gonzalez;type=0#
https://hdl.handle.net/10669/85908
Palabra clave:Dental implant
Fatigue
Implant abutment
Implant holder
Implant mount
TECNOLOGÍA MÉDICA - ODONTOLOGÍA