Interdisciplinarity of the Social and Legal Sciences: Intellectual imposture or scientific aspiration?

 

Gorde:
Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Egilea: Salas, Minor E.
Formatua: artículo original
Egoera:Versión publicada
Argitaratze data:2022
Deskribapena:This article presents a critical analysis of a present-day topic: The interdisciplinarityof the social and legal sciences. It establishes that in order to fulfill this objective,the indiscriminate use of the word inter- or transdisciplinarity does not suffice. It isnecessary to conduct a realistic study on the theoretical difficulties that runs counterto this objective. The study analyzes mainly three “epistemological obstacles” thatoppose team work in the following disciplines: (1) the problem of incommensurability between paradigms (Kuhn, Feyerabend), (2) the problem of the linguistic-relativityprinciple (Whorf, Sapir, Wittgenstein), and (3) the problem of close or autopoietical systems (Luhmann, Teubner). The article concludes that behind these obstacles there exists a significant amount of confusion, and even intellectual pedantry.Interdisciplinarity demands, beyond the overcoming of logical barriers, both a personal and antidogmatic attitude and a constant struggle against arrogance, vanity and professional chauvinism.
Herria:Portal de Revistas UCR
Erakundea:Universidad de Costa Rica
Repositorio:Portal de Revistas UCR
Hizkuntza:Español
OAI Identifier:oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/51127
Sarrera elektronikoa:https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/sociales/article/view/51127
Gako-hitza:SOCIAL SCIENCES
LEGAL THEORY
INTERDISCIPLINARITY
EPISTEMOLOGICAL OBSTACLE
INCOMMENSURABILITY
PARADIGM
LINGUISTIC-RELATIVITY PRINCIPLE
AUTOPOIESIS
CIENCIA SOCIAL
TEORÍA DEL DERECHO
INTERDISCIPLINARIEDAD
OBSTÁCULO EPISTEMOLÓGICO
INCONMENSURABILIDAD
PARADIGMA
PRINCIPIO DE RELATIVIDAD LINGÜÍSTICA