Ineficacia del recurso de casación en Costa Rica

 

Tallennettuna:
Bibliografiset tiedot
Tekijä: Rivera Cheves, Joseph Alfonso
Aineistotyyppi: artículo original
Tila:Versión publicada
Julkaisupäivä:2017
Kuvaus:This study analyzes the admissibility requirements currently in place for processing appeals in criminal cases. A random analysis of several records of the Third Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice and the resolution of the case Mauricio Herrera versus Costa Rica were taken as a parameter on the appeals of judgment in order to determine why the Third Chamber rejects most of said resources. By analyzing jurisprudence, it was established that some criminal lawyers did not know the formalities of Article 468 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and filed those appeals  without analyzing and considering the objective, subjective and contradictory aspects of the rulings of the Court of Criminal Appeals to resolve those sentences and without deeply analyzing the case Mauricio Herrera versus Costa Rica. The most relevant court decisions are revealed through this article as an analogy of the aforementioned case.
Maa:Portal de Revistas UCR
Organisaatio:Universidad de Costa Rica
Repositorio:Portal de Revistas UCR
Kieli:Español
OAI Identifier:oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/29861
Linkit:https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/juridicas/article/view/29861
Sanahaku:Recurso casación
recurso de apelación
preceptos contradictorios
elementos objetivos y subjetivos
admisibilidad
Cassation appeal
appeal
contradictory precepts
objective and subjective aspects
admissibility