Contrafácticos: ¿una dieta limitada de ejemplos?

 

Gorde:
Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Egilea: Camacho, Luis
Formatua: artículo original
Egoera:Versión publicada
Argitaratze data:2015
Deskribapena:The justification for alternative calculi based on particular cases that seem to conflict with the truth-table of the standard conditional is here analyzed. We advocate a more thorough examination of oft-repeated examples and a search for different kinds of new ones. Leibniz’s interpretation of legal statements as probable hypotheticals is mentioned as a model for the type of work proposed in this paper. Although several kinds of conditionals are usually distinguished in logic textbooks, counterfactuals are almost always placed together as a single category. We propose here that several kinds of counterfactuals can be distinguished from a logical perspective; some of them are mentioned.
Herria:Portal de Revistas UCR
Erakundea:Universidad de Costa Rica
Repositorio:Portal de Revistas UCR
Hizkuntza:Español
OAI Identifier:oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/21336
Sarrera elektronikoa:https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/21336
Gako-hitza:lógica modal
enunciados legales
condicionales
leibniz
contrafácticos
modal logic
legal statements
conditionals
counterfactuals