Las polémicas científicas en la Costa Rica del siglo XIX: El caso de la meteorología
Guardado en:
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo original |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2016 |
| Descripción: | This article aims to analyze the main factors that led to a series of scientific controversies linked with the institutionalization of meteorology as a scientific activity in Costa Rica. The foundation of the National Meteorological Observatory (1887) and later the National Meteorological Institute (1888), brought a debate on the validity of meteorological observations in the country before the founding of the first institution. This question provoked an intense debate involving Henri Pittier, director of the Meteorological Institute and other actors members of the Costa Rican scientific community (Enrique Villavicencio, Pedro Nolasco Gutierrez, Carlos Francisco Salazar, Jose Moreno and Juan Fernandez Ferraz). They questioned the validity of the work of the scientific entity in the meteorological field. The background of this controversy is linked to the closure of the University of St. Thomas (1888) and the growing support that provided the Costa Rican government to scientists projects of Pittier. This author and his interlocutors discussed their ideas in the media of the time and their controversy not infrequently transcended the scientific field to the personal one. |
| País: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| Institución: | Universidad de Costa Rica |
| Repositorio: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/27351 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/estudios/article/view/27351 |
| Palabra clave: | Costa Rica history science meteorology scientific controversy historia ciencia meteorología controversia científica |