For an effective political discussion of Human rights
Guardado en:
| 作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | artículo original |
| 狀態: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2023 |
| 實物特徵: | In 2016, Professor Mario Solís Umaña published a book entitled: Justicia Situacional. Racionalidad, normatividad y teoría crítica latinoamericanista, which contains a criticism against the explanation developed by Helio Gallardo on the foundatios of human rights. This work answers the two main criticisms that Solís makes of Gallardo: the accusation of social foundationism and what I will call criticism of the subject that enunciates/produces human rights. In both cases I will show that Solís’ criticism is not very faithful to Gallardo’s text and, furthermore, it is internally inconsistent. I conclude that the discussion on the foundation of human rights proposed by Helio Gallardo continues to be the best theoreticalcomprehensive version to approach this thematicfield. |
| País: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| 機構: | Universidad de Costa Rica |
| Repositorio: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| 語言: | Español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/56754 |
| 在線閱讀: | https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/56754 |
| Palabra clave: | derechos humanos sujeto de derechos humanos fundacionismo social matriz human rights human rights subject social foundationism matrix |