Formulación de la teoría del injusto: La perspectiva de Juarez Tavares
Guardado en:
| Údar: | |
|---|---|
| Formáid: | artículo original |
| Stádas: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2016 |
| Cur Síos: | Within the analysis of criminal liability, the concepts of action, satisfaction of all offense elements, wrongfulness and culpability are of obligatory study, and although its construction delayed a decade, could be considered that there were agreements about the ways to analyze them. Professor Juarez Tavarez, takes up the study of the unlawful (which includes the satisfaction of all offense elements and wrongfulness) and accomplishes an innovative and above all, respectful proposal of the human person, both on its content and on its way to analyze it. |
| País: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| Institiúid: | Universidad de Costa Rica |
| Repositorio: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| Teanga: | Español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/25246 |
| Rochtain Ar Líne: | https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/iusdoctrina/article/view/25246 |
| Palabra clave: | rule boundary rules individual guarantees principle of legality content of the unlawful offense elements satisfaction of all offense elements imputation legal goods wrongfulness defenses Norma normas delimitadoras Garantías individuales Principio de Legalidad Contenido del injusto Tipo Tipicidad Imputación Bien jurídico Antijuridicidad Causas de Justificación |