Exsistentia non est realitas: La tesis de Kant sobre el ser
Guardado en:
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo original |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2014 |
| Descripción: | For Immanuel Kant existence and reality are not interchangeable. In this way, Kant is following a long medieval tradition. Here I am presenting some precise indications about philosophical terms in order to better understand what Martin Heidegger called the Kantian thesis on being. I begin by studying the synonymy of some words and the conceptual differences between them. This allows the reader to reach a deeper comprehension of two works by Kant: The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God (1763) and the Critique of Pure Reason (1781, 1787). Then, I analyze some of Kant’s fragments in German by contrasting them to their Spanish, French, and English translations. I also include references to the Latin translation of the Critique of Pure Reason. Finally, I show that the already canonical translations of Kant’s works unfor- tunately are often wrong, since he consistently distinguishes between existence and reality. On the contrary, such translations are not consistent and misinterpret Kant’s thought concerning those central notions. |
| País: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| Institución: | Universidad de Costa Rica |
| Repositorio: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/17758 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/17758 |
| Palabra clave: | existencia realidad ser distinción idealismo existence reality being distinction idealism |