Conceptual and statistical problems associated with the use of diversity indices in ecology

 

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Barrantes, Gilbert, Sandoval, Luis
Formato: artículo original
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de Publicación:2009
Descripción:Diversity indices, particularly the Shannon-Wiener index, have extensively been used in analyzing patterns of diversity at different geographic and ecological scales. These indices have serious conceptual and statistical problems which make comparisons of species richness or species abundances across communities nearly impossible. There is often no a single statistical method that retains all information needed to answer even a simple question. However, multivariate analyses could be used instead of diversity indices, such as cluster analyses or multiple regressions. More complex multivariate analyses, such as Canonical Correspondence Analysis, provide very valuable information on environmental variables associated to the presence and abundance of the species in a community. In addition, particular hypotheses associated to changes in species richness across localities, or change in abundance of one, or a group of species can be tested using univariate, bivariate, and/or rarefaction statistical tests. The rarefaction method has proved to be robust to standardize all samples to a common size. Even the simplest method as reporting the number of species per taxonomic category possibly provides more information than a diversity index value.
País:Portal de Revistas UCR
Institución:Universidad de Costa Rica
Repositorio:Portal de Revistas UCR
Lenguaje:Inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/5467
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/article/view/5467
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:indices de diversidad
riqueza de especies
abundancia de especies
análisis multivariables
avifauna de tierras altas
diversity indices
multivariate analyses
species richness
species abundance
highland avifauna