Effect of trap size when quantifying plant material fall

 

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Quesada-Acuña, Sergio Gabriel, Pérez-Gómez, Gabriela
Formato: artículo original
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de Publicación:2023
Descripción:Introduction: Many natural phenomena studied by ecologists (e.g. seed rain, litter production) require quantitative methods that collect data in the absence of the researcher, favoring for example traps. Traps vary in shape, size, and material, and their selection should be carefully considered. There are few studies that compare the performance of traps of different sizes and their effect on estimates. Objective: To compare two sizes of a common trap designed to quantify the fall of plant material. Methods: In a tropical urban park in San José, Costa Rica, we placed a total of 74 square traps (large trap = 0,50m2, with a concentric 0,25m2 subsection representing the small trap) in three microhabitats (grass; forest edge and under isolated trees).  From July 2021 to June 2022 we collected the tramp contents twice a month (annual sampling effort: 144 hours per trap). Results: The large trap results in lower density estimates, leading to higher errors and standard deviations. The small trap estimates higher densities but reduces the standard deviation and error. The coefficients of variation of both traps were similar. Conclusion: Vegetation trap studies must consider the effect of trap size on density estimates, error estimates and standard deviations.
País:Portal de Revistas UNED
Institución:Universidad Estatal a Distancia
Repositorio:Portal de Revistas UNED
Lenguaje:Español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.investiga.uned.ac.cr:article/4368
Acceso en línea:https://revistas.uned.ac.cr/index.php/cuadernos/article/view/4368
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:dispersion
seed rain
urban park
natural regeneration
trap size
seed trap
dispersión
lluvia de semillas
parque urbano
regeneración natural
tamaño de trampa
trampa de semillas