Momento hermeneútico del juez constitucional

 

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur: Cambronero Torres, Andrei
Format: artículo original
Statut:Versión publicada
Date de publication:2013
Description:This essay analyzes two pronouncements by the Constitutional Court, providing a conflict solution based on the content that “fills” the legal rules, just to reflect that hermeneutic practice pertaining to the legal function has no recipes, no univocal patterns, but just one subject who judges. Furthermore, it defends “judicio” as the common ground of technical factors, personal convictions, “prejudice” and “pre-conceptions”, as a result of an interpretation of the law propitiously “flawed” by external non-juridical elements.
Pays:Portal de Revistas UCR
Institution:Universidad de Costa Rica
Repositorio:Portal de Revistas UCR
Langue:Español
OAI Identifier:oai:archivo.portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/12506
Accès en ligne:https://archivo.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/juridicas/article/view/12506
Mots-clés:realismo jurídico
interpretación judicial
juez constitucional
concepto de familia
interpretación evolutiva
interpretación creativa
legal realism
judicial interpretation
constitutional judge family concept
evolutionary interpretation
creative interpretation