Momento hermeneútico del juez constitucional
שמור ב:
| מחבר: | |
|---|---|
| פורמט: | artículo original |
| סטטוס: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2013 |
| תיאור: | This essay analyzes two pronouncements by the Constitutional Court, providing a conflict solution based on the content that “fills” the legal rules, just to reflect that hermeneutic practice pertaining to the legal function has no recipes, no univocal patterns, but just one subject who judges. Furthermore, it defends “judicio” as the common ground of technical factors, personal convictions, “prejudice” and “pre-conceptions”, as a result of an interpretation of the law propitiously “flawed” by external non-juridical elements. |
| País: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| מוסד: | Universidad de Costa Rica |
| Repositorio: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| שפה: | Español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:archivo.portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/12506 |
| גישה מקוונת: | https://archivo.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/juridicas/article/view/12506 |
| מילת מפתח: | realismo jurídico interpretación judicial juez constitucional concepto de familia interpretación evolutiva interpretación creativa legal realism judicial interpretation constitutional judge family concept evolutionary interpretation creative interpretation |