Exsistentia non est realitas: La tesis de Kant sobre el ser
সংরক্ষণ করুন:
| লেখক: | |
|---|---|
| বিন্যাস: | artículo original |
| বর্তমান অবস্থা: | Versión publicada |
| প্রকাশনার তারিখ: | 2014 |
| বিবরন: | For Immanuel Kant existence and reality are not interchangeable. In this way, Kant is following a long medieval tradition. Here I am presenting some precise indications about philosophical terms in order to better understand what Martin Heidegger called the Kantian thesis on being. I begin by studying the synonymy of some words and the conceptual differences between them. This allows the reader to reach a deeper comprehension of two works by Kant: The Only Possible Argument in Support of a Demonstration of the Existence of God (1763) and the Critique of Pure Reason (1781, 1787). Then, I analyze some of Kant’s fragments in German by contrasting them to their Spanish, French, and English translations. I also include references to the Latin translation of the Critique of Pure Reason. Finally, I show that the already canonical translations of Kant’s works unfor- tunately are often wrong, since he consistently distinguishes between existence and reality. On the contrary, such translations are not consistent and misinterpret Kant’s thought concerning those central notions. |
| দেশ: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| প্রতিষ্ঠান: | Universidad de Costa Rica |
| Repositorio: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| ভাষা: | Español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:archivo.portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/17758 |
| অনলাইন ব্যবহার করুন: | https://archivo.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filosofia/article/view/17758 |
| মুখ্য শব্দ: | existencia realidad ser distinción idealismo existence reality being distinction idealism |