Expected and unexpected effects of sexism on women’s math performance

 

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: Smith-Castro, Vanessa, Montero-Rojas, Eiliana, Moreira-Mora, Tania Elena, Zamora Araya, José Andrey
Format: artículo
Date de publication:2019
Description:Research has shown that gender differences in math performance are partially predicted by sociocultural aspects such as sexist ideologies and stereotypes. This study examined sexist ideologies as predictors of women’s performance in standardized math tests, and the mediation role of math-gender stereotypes and math self-efficacy on this relationship, while controlling for abstract reasoning. Data were analyzed in samples from High School girls and university women majoring in Social Sciences, Humanities and STEM. In secondary school, the results showed the indirect, albeit expected, effect of gender stereotypes on mathematical performance through mathematical self-efficacy. The model fit was lower at a university level, and an unexpectedly positive relationship emerged between hostile sexism and mathematical performance among STEM students. The results suggest several mechanisms by which gender ideologies and stereotypes affect women's mathematical performance.
Pays:Repositorio UNA
Institution:Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica
Repositorio:Repositorio UNA
Langue:Inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:https://repositorio.una.ac.cr:11056/22290
Accès en ligne:http://hdl.handle.net/11056/22290
Access Level:acceso abierto
Mots-clés:SEXISM
STEREOTYPES
MATH SELF-EFFICACY
STANDARDIZED MATH TESTS
SEXISMOS
ESTEREOTIPOS
AUTOEFICACIA MATEMÁTICA
PRUEBAS ESTANDARIZADAS DE MATEMÁTICA