Caso fortuito y fuerza mayor. Diferencia conceptual
שמור ב:
| מחבר: | |
|---|---|
| פורמט: | artículo original |
| סטטוס: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2014 |
| תיאור: | The main objective of this article is to define the concepts of act of God and force majeure under the scope of doctrine and our body of laws. It seeks to establish the most important differences to clarify that these two concepts are different from a functional stand and to analyze in depth the fact that they act in different moments of the mandatory juridical relation. It will state in detail that the act of God acts in the analysis of guilt, while force majeure acts in the field of causal nexus. Moreover, it will develop some ideas of modern doctrine on these concepts. The main objective is the help the reader understand the meaning of every concept and their practical application, consider- ing that both are situations where the debtor is exonerated from responsibility. |
| País: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| מוסד: | Universidad de Costa Rica |
| Repositorio: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| שפה: | Español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/13509 |
| גישה מקוונת: | https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/juridicas/article/view/13509 |
| מילת מפתח: | Intellectual property rights data protection free trade agreements Obligación jurídica cumplimiento incumplimiento culpabilidad exoneración de responsabilidad caso fortuito fuerza mayor diferencias |