Momento hermeneútico del juez constitucional
Guardado en:
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo original |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2013 |
| Descripción: | This essay analyzes two pronouncements by the Constitutional Court, providing a conflict solution based on the content that “fills” the legal rules, just to reflect that hermeneutic practice pertaining to the legal function has no recipes, no univocal patterns, but just one subject who judges. Furthermore, it defends “judicio” as the common ground of technical factors, personal convictions, “prejudice” and “pre-conceptions”, as a result of an interpretation of the law propitiously “flawed” by external non-juridical elements. |
| País: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| Institución: | Universidad de Costa Rica |
| Repositorio: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| Lenguaje: | Español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:portal.ucr.ac.cr:article/12506 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/juridicas/article/view/12506 |
| Palabra clave: | realismo jurídico interpretación judicial juez constitucional concepto de familia interpretación evolutiva interpretación creativa legal realism judicial interpretation constitutional judge family concept evolutionary interpretation creative interpretation |