Relaciones de Consecuencia Lógica Supraclásicas y Filosofía de la Ciencia
Guardado en:
| 作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | artículo original |
| 狀態: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2026 |
| 實物特徵: | This paper examines the distinction between the context of discovery and the context of justification in the philosophy of science, in light of the philosophical and epistemological assumptions underlying supraclassical logical consequence relations. Two supraclassical formal systems are studied: non-monotonic logics and adaptive logics, and it is argued that these formalizations allow for a reconsideration of the limits and scope of the debate sparked by the distinction between contexts. The paper concludes by recognizing the importance of this contextual distinction, while emphasizing that this debate cannot overlook the development of contemporary logic. |
| País: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| 機構: | Universidad de Costa Rica |
| Repositorio: | Portal de Revistas UCR |
| 語言: | Español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:portal.revistas.ucr.ac.cr:article/6924 |
| 在線閱讀: | https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rfilosofia/article/view/6924 |
| Palabra clave: | filosofía de la ciencia relaciones supraclásicas consecuencia lógica contexto de descubrimiento contexto de justificación philosophy of science supraclassical relations logical consequence context of discovery context of justification |