Comparative analysis of accreditation models for graduate programs or careers
সংরক্ষণ করুন:
| লেখক: | |
|---|---|
| বিন্যাস: | artículo original |
| বর্তমান অবস্থা: | Versión publicada |
| প্রকাশনার তারিখ: | 2024 |
| বিবরন: | This research aims to identify the differences and similarities between the model of the Central American Agency for Postgraduate Accreditation (ACAP) and the model of the Honduran System for Accreditation of Quality in Higher Education (SHACES). The research methodology is descriptive with a qualitative approach using the comparative method. According to the results, both models are based on the same theory: Stufflebeam's Systemic Model of Context, Inputs, Processes, and Outputs (CIPP). In addition, both structure aspects relate to teaching, research, linkage, academics, administrative management, and internationalization. Among the differences, it is highlighted that accreditation with ACAP is voluntary, while with SHACES it is mandatory. |
| দেশ: | Portal de Revistas UNED |
| প্রতিষ্ঠান: | Universidad Estatal a Distancia |
| Repositorio: | Portal de Revistas UNED |
| ভাষা: | Español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.investiga.uned.ac.cr:article/5560 |
| অনলাইন ব্যবহার করুন: | https://revistas.uned.ac.cr/index.php/revistacalidad/article/view/5560 |
| মুখ্য শব্দ: | quality of education Higher education accreditation educational evaluation Acreditación calidad de la educación educación superior evaluación educativa |